A Turning Point for Residential Real Estate: What It Means for Buyers and Sellers

- A 2024 legal settlement by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) is reshaping how residential real estate commissions work.
- Sellers must now decide whether — and how — to offer compensation to a buyer’s agent; buyers must sign written commission agreements with their agents, which can carry long-term obligations.
- In this increasingly complex environment, we outline key considerations and how to avoid potential pitfalls as you navigate this process.
In 2024, the National Association of Realtors agreed to a $418 million settlement in a class action case alleging antitrust violations related to residential real estate commissions. As part of the settlement, the NAR agreed to modify its rules governing the sharing of commissions between the brokers representing buyers and sellers through the Multiple Listing Service (MLS).
The resulting changes have disrupted long-standing practices in home sales, including how buyers and sellers engage and compensate agents. As these changes are introduced in local markets across the country, buyers and sellers alike face new decisions — and potential risks — when contemplating a purchase or sale. In this paper, we outline key considerations and offer practical guidance to help you navigate the evolving landscape.
What the Settlement Means
Prior to 2024, sellers in most states paid their agent a gross commission — typically 5% to 6%, with a portion going to the buyer’s agent. Depending on the state, the buyer’s agent in many cases was, legally, a co-broker with the selling broker. This created confusion and conflicts for both the buyer and the buyer’s agent.
Revised NAR rules and policies following the recent class action settlement, effective August 17, 2024, include:
- Listing agents may not offer commissions to buyer agents on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), a database that aggregates property listings and is widely used by real estate professionals to share and access home sale information. However, compensation offers may still be made outside of the MLS.
- As a result, MLS platforms cannot allow agents to filter real estate listings based on the commission offered as was done prior to the settlement.
- Agents representing buyers must enter a separate written commission agreement with those buyers before showing them properties.
While these rule changes are reshaping many aspects of the residential real estate market, implementation has been uneven in different parts of the country, and many brokerage companies have yet to adopt standardized agreements. Here are some points for sellers and buyers to keep in mind.
The NAR: Industry Dominance and Legal Scrutiny
Locally and nationally, the NAR has a dominant position in the residential real estate market.
Founded in 1908, the NAR has more than 1.5 million members, including 85% of licensed residential real estate professionals. With approximately 1,400 local associations or member boards throughout all 50 states and four U.S. territories, the NAR is the nation’s largest trade association and one of the largest lobbyists. For comparison, the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association have approximately a third of licensed medical doctors and lawyers, respectively, as members.
NAR member professionals account for about 93% of residential real estate transactions annually, and only NAR members may legally describe themselves as Realtors. Although Realtor has become common parlance — similar to once-trademarked terms that have become generic, such as aspirin, cellophane, escalator, thermos, and dumpster — it remains a registered trademark owned and enforced by the National Association of Realtors and must not be used to describe non-member agents.
The NAR controls the Multiple Listing Service.
The NAR also sets policy and practice for member firms and is involved in developing brokerage law. Decades of lawsuits challenging the NAR’s authority over commission rates have had little practical impact on the 6% rate the NAR established in 1939.
That industry dominance has attracted legal scrutiny besides the litigation resulting in the landmark 2024 settlement. For example:
- In 1950, after hearing a challenge to the NAR’s 1939 policy setting commissions at 6%, the U.S. Supreme Court declared set commissions illegal but did not hinder the NAR from recommending commission rates for its members.
- In 1971, with a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) challenge looming, the NAR ended its policy of specifying a commission split between a selling and buying broker (though the split remained a standard practice).
In recent years, the DOJ has initiated other investigations and lawsuits challenging NAR practices — such as masking commission offers and payments between brokers and restricting access and use of the Multiple Listing Service and key lockboxes to NAR members. The NAR is still facing other litigation including a pending suit and an ongoing DOJ investigation into its practices.
Considerations for Sellers
Your commission decisions as a seller are more involved than in the past. Your broker may encourage you to take the simple approach: replicating the pre-settlement model by offering reasonable compensation for a buyer’s broker at a rate similar to what your broker might have shared in the past.
For many sellers, replicating the old model by offering compensation to the buyer’s broker may be an appropriate solution. Since the MLS, per the settlement, can no longer display broker compensation, you should understand how your offer will be communicated. In some states, such as California, a simple check box on the standard escrow form for residential transactions enables buyers to indicate that they expect the seller to compensate their broker.
But it’s no longer a given that the seller will pay the buying agent’s commission. For some high-value residential properties, we’re seeing a commission structure similar to commercial real estate transactions where buyer and seller pay their own advisors and brokers, with an indemnity against claims for commission by the other’s respective professionals.
And in competitive bidding situations, some buyers are seeking to distinguish themselves by offering to pay their agent’s commission. We’re still in early days: Time will tell whether these practices become more common and how, if at all, commission rates might be affected.
Considerations for Buyers
Understand what you’re signing: Homebuyers face the biggest changes. If you hire an agent to represent you, they will now present you with a formal commission agreement. These forms may be difficult to interpret and vary depending on the state, local MLS, and agency. All of the terms are negotiable, and it’s a good idea to seek advice before signing.
Watch for long-term commitments: Some commission agreements create long-term, binding obligations between the buyer and the agent for the eventual purchase of a home. These forms may be difficult to interpret and vary depending on the state and local agency. If you have an agreement with another buyer’s broker, make sure you understand its terms before you sign a new agreement. You may still have an obligation to pay the other buyer’s broker if you buy a home even though you have signed a new agreement with another agent.
If the form states that it is an “exclusive” agreement, you likely have an obligation to pay a commission to the broker if you buy (or possibly rent) a home during its term and an additional period after termination for any property a broker identified to you. This period may be very long; in printed forms, we have seen exclusive and tail periods as long as 360 days. We’ve also seen that what constitutes a property that was identified by a buyer’s agent to a buyer is not always clearly defined.
Clarify the scope: Depending on the agreement language, the obligation may extend to your family members or a domestic partner. And even if you sign a new agreement with a different broker, you could still owe a commission to a previous one.
Limit your exposure: As you navigate this process, consider these suggestions:
- Limit the exclusive and tail periods (the period the broker may still earn a commission after the agreement ends), especially if you are only seeing a few properties and are unsure you want to see others. You might propose seven days for the exclusive period and 60 days for the tail period.
- Put in writing that the commission applies only if you purchase a home identified by the broker.
- Require the broker to provide a written, regularly updated list of properties they have shown you, to avoid ambiguity.
- Consider limiting the geographic area and price range of properties.
- State the commission rate and provide that if it is paid in whole or in part by the seller, the commission is limited to the stated rate. If you choose to extend your relationship with the broker or terminate it, make sure you do so in writing.
Understand Your Obligations — and Your Options
The NAR policy changes have introduced new complexity into residential real estate transactions, especially around commissions and broker relationships. As a buyer or seller, clearly defining your obligations to a broker — while understanding where you have room to negotiate — can help you avoid surprises, build a more productive and transparent relationship, and protect yourself against potential claims.
If you’re considering buying or selling a home, Bessemer’s Real Estate Advisory team can answer your questions and help you navigate these changes. For more information, please contact your Bessemer advisor.
A Checklist for Sellers and Buyers
With the 2024 NAR settlement in mind, consider these questions before signing a listing agreement (for sellers) or a commission agreement (for buyers):
Sellers
- What is the commission rate for the selling broker?
- What, if anything, is offered to the buyer’s broker?
- If I offer to pay a commission to a buyer’s broker, how will that be represented to the market?
- If there is no buyer’s broker, what is a fair commission for the selling broker?
- When does the broker earn and get paid a commission? Is there any circumstance in which the broker is paid but the property is not sold?
Buyers
- What is my commission obligation to the broker? Are the exclusive and tail periods reasonable?
- Does the agreement provide for the seller to potentially pay my agent?
- Will my agent provide a written list of properties shown? How many properties can they claim after termination?
- Does the contract limit the geographic search area?
- What happens if I see a property with another buyer’s broker?
- When does the broker earn and get paid a commission? Is there any circumstance in which the broker is paid but a home is not purchased?
- Can I terminate the agreement if I do not like working with the agent?
This material is for your general information. It does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual clients. This material is based upon information obtained from various sources that Bessemer Trust believes to be reliable, but Bessemer makes no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The views expressed herein do not constitute legal or tax advice; are current only as of the date indicated; and are subject to change without notice. Forecasts may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including changes in economic growth, corporate profitability, geopolitical conditions, and inflation. Bessemer Trust or its clients may have investments in the securities discussed herein, and this material does not constitute an investment recommendation by Bessemer Trust or an offering of such securities, and our view of these holdings may change at any time based on stock price movements, new research conclusions, or changes in risk preference.